[06]
Evidence Vault
Step 4 — read the evidence labels carefully. Each label bounds what a source supports. Baseline validated through August 2026.
Megfigyelt / dokumentált
OBSERVEDA source supports the stated event within the limits of that case. It does not automatically support the next step in a chain.
CARDS (8) · FEED (0)
A-01A-02A-03A-04A-05A-06A-07A-09
SCENARIO STEPS (9)
- SC-01 Port IT ransomware / DDoS
- SC-01 Logistics & berthing delay
- SC-02 Local access / removable media
- SC-02 Vessel IT infection
- SC-03 GNSS jamming / spoofing
- SC-03 Position/time error
- SC-04 SATCOM outage / wiper
- SC-05 Provider compromise
- SC-05 Multi-tenant outage
Technikai megvalósíthatóság
FEASIBLEResearch supports a mechanism under stated conditions. Operational adversary use not established.
CARDS (1) · FEED (0)
A-08
SCENARIO STEPS (3)
- SC-03 Targeted USV diversion
- SC-06 Bridge/component weakness
- SC-06 Sensor data manipulation
Rendszerfüggő / feltételes
CONDITIONALConsequence depends on a connection, reliance, permission or operating mode that must be established.
CARDS (0) · FEED (0)
SCENARIO STEPS (6)
- SC-01 Mobilisation delayed
- SC-02 Crossing to OT
- SC-03 Survey data degraded
- SC-04 Lost remote supervision
- SC-04 Mission pause / abort
- SC-05 Fleet-wide cascade
Nem megalapozott
NOT ESTABLISHEDAvailable evidence does not support the conclusion. This does not mean the event is impossible.
CARDS (0) · FEED (0)
SCENARIO STEPS (3)
- SC-01 Terminal-control compromise
- SC-02 Control manipulation
- SC-06 Command takeover
BNDEvidence boundaries
- SC-01 A port-service outage does not establish terminal-control compromise.
- SC-02 Local IT access does not establish access to vessel control.
- SC-03 GNSS radio interference is not evidence of a vessel-network intrusion.
- SC-04 Loss of comms is an availability effect, not command takeover.
- SC-05 Wider consequence requires a common, material dependency.
- SC-06 Remains a technical-feasibility scenario despite operational importance.